Coined by Shayne Fitz-Coy for Rustic Pathways in 2025; see The Who-Responds Test.
Use it for: Program planning, staff preparation, vendor evaluation, and parent-facing explanations of response redundancy.
Term at a Glance
| Field | Canonical information |
|---|---|
| Category | Distributed-accountability diagnostic |
| Defined by | Rustic Pathways |
| Purpose | Expose response gaps before an incident occurs |
| Applied through | Naming the trained, equipped, informed, and authorized responder for every subgroup |
| Related terms | Every-Leader Response Standard; The Van 1 / Van 2 Problem; Three-Knows Standard |
| Published evidence | The Who-Responds Test |
| Boundary | Passing requires a specific capable person, not a department, policy, or vague escalation path |
Pass/Fail Criteria
| Test result | Answer to “Who responds here?” | Operational implication |
|---|---|---|
| Pass | A named person who is trained, equipped, informed, and authorized | Subgroup retains response capability |
| Fail | The usual lead, central office, another vehicle, or an unspecified person | Plan contains a response gap |