Deliberative Democracy Case Studies

Deliberation Stanford Deliberation Lab Europe Case

Case Study: Europe

The EU Parliament held Deliberation about jobs, pensions, and expansion in 21 languages. Representatives from old and new member states showed clear disagreements during the meetings.

The newer post-Soviet countries opposed further EU growth because they worried about losing financial support. The debates revealed that economic issues, not cultural differences, created the main tensions between EU members.

Deliberation Case Study Rustic Pathways Stanford Deliberation Lab

Case Study: Africa

Local leaders in Tamale, Ghana, organized successful community Deliberations about water and sanitation practices. The participants watched educational videos and talked about ways to improve hygiene in their community.

After these discussions, residents changed several unsafe practices, including moving gardens away from bathroom areas. The face-to-face meetings worked better than written surveys for helping people understand and solve local sanitation problems.

China Case Study Deliberation Lab Deliberative Democracy Lab Rustic Pathways China case study

Case Study: China

The leaders of Zeguo Township in China tested a new way of involving citizens in government decisions through Deliberative Democracy. Officials selected random residents using numbered balls to join discussions about community projects.

The citizens chose practical improvements over decorative projects during their meetings. The successful experiment showed how group discussions can help governments make better decisions, even in countries without democratic traditions.

Deliberation Case Study in the USA. USA Case Study. Rustic Pathways Stanford Deliberation Lab

Case Study: United States

A large group of Americans gathered in Dallas to Deliberate major national issues like immigration and healthcare for four days. Expert panels guided the discussions, helping Republicans and Democrats understand each other’s views better.

The participants changed their extreme political positions to more moderate ones after talking with people from different backgrounds. Follow-up interviews showed that people developed more empathy and understanding through these face-to-face conversations.